<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pandora Ads inserted into Stream</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/</link>
	<description>A state of confusion.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 04:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/#comment-2914</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 20:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornswaggled.com/?p=47#comment-2914</guid>
		<description>From Pandora:
We've taken down the McDonalds ad and we're still digesting our listener's feedback. It's likely the case that we'll run other tests before we can conclusively close the books on the question of audio ads on Pandora.

We really value that our listeners and our advertisers are part of a constructive dialogue about how we best support the site with advertising. Thanks to all of you that participated in this conversation.

We'll do a better job next time of describing our plans here on the blog in advance of any additional tests. Stay tuned and don't be shy about weighing in on the issue here or via pandora-support@pandora.com. As always, we love to hear your thoughts on all-things-Pandora.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From Pandora:<br />
We&#8217;ve taken down the McDonalds ad and we&#8217;re still digesting our listener&#8217;s feedback. It&#8217;s likely the case that we&#8217;ll run other tests before we can conclusively close the books on the question of audio ads on Pandora.</p>
<p>We really value that our listeners and our advertisers are part of a constructive dialogue about how we best support the site with advertising. Thanks to all of you that participated in this conversation.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll do a better job next time of describing our plans here on the blog in advance of any additional tests. Stay tuned and don&#8217;t be shy about weighing in on the issue here or via <a href="mailto:pandora-support@pandora.com">pandora-support@pandora.com</a>. As always, we love to hear your thoughts on all-things-Pandora.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/#comment-2903</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Feb 2007 16:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornswaggled.com/?p=47#comment-2903</guid>
		<description>I listen to Pandora somewhat regularly but haven't heard the ads.  Do you think they're on all streams?

$3 a month seems high just to let us avoid ads on Pandora.  I agree with you that $20/year is a much better price point.  Isn't Last.fm asking that amount?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listen to Pandora somewhat regularly but haven&#8217;t heard the ads.  Do you think they&#8217;re on all streams?</p>
<p>$3 a month seems high just to let us avoid ads on Pandora.  I agree with you that $20/year is a much better price point.  Isn&#8217;t Last.fm asking that amount?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/#comment-2793</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 18:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornswaggled.com/?p=47#comment-2793</guid>
		<description>Yeah I agree that they need to pay their bills somehow but not sure if the ads actually irritate me that much yet.

The users put a lot of time into getting their stations to play correctly and I'm not going to jump ship that easy. Im hoping for something that works. What if they were acquired by G or Y? That would be a cool value added for those big guys and getting user feedback is something they both find very valuable.

A large user base is always worth something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I agree that they need to pay their bills somehow but not sure if the ads actually irritate me that much yet.</p>
<p>The users put a lot of time into getting their stations to play correctly and I&#8217;m not going to jump ship that easy. Im hoping for something that works. What if they were acquired by G or Y? That would be a cool value added for those big guys and getting user feedback is something they both find very valuable.</p>
<p>A large user base is always worth something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.hornswaggled.com/2007/01/09/pandora-ads-inserted-into-stream/#comment-2787</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 03:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hornswaggled.com/?p=47#comment-2787</guid>
		<description>Well they do have an ad free version for $36 a year.  When i first started listening there was no ads but they said there would be, than i stopped listening for awhile.  I than recently went back and started seeing those giant altoid ads, thought it was weird to have a visual ad for audio content. I havent heard the audio ads yet but that must just stink.  Than again something has to pay the bills.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they do have an ad free version for $36 a year.  When i first started listening there was no ads but they said there would be, than i stopped listening for awhile.  I than recently went back and started seeing those giant altoid ads, thought it was weird to have a visual ad for audio content. I havent heard the audio ads yet but that must just stink.  Than again something has to pay the bills.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
